Skip to content

reference grammar: remove duplicate else_tail rule #28204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2015

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Sep 3, 2015

The rule else_tail was duplicated in if and if_let sections. I guess that this is a mistake.

r? @steveklabnik

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 3, 2015

📌 Commit 000fe00 has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2015
…, r=steveklabnik

The rule `else_tail` was duplicated in `if` and `if_let` sections. I guess that this is a mistake.

r? @steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 000fe00 into rust-lang:master Sep 4, 2015
@matklad matklad deleted the grammar-duplicate-else-tail branch July 9, 2019 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants